News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Caching AJAX calls with local storage by untog on Friday July 20, 2012 @09:12AM (#4270546)
Couldn't you use just an extra query string parameter when you want to force a refresh? Like, ?v=12312312353. It's a little hackish I'll grant you, but so is caching HTTP in LocalStorage.
Re:Caching AJAX calls with local storage by pohl on Friday July 20, 2012 @10:14AM (#4270875)
This won't actually cause anything to be evicted from the cache. It just adds a new cache entry with a new key. This is poor resource management, and removes some of the appeal of going out of your way to reuse the browser's cache mechanism.
Re:Caching AJAX calls with local storage by untog on Friday July 20, 2012 @10:56AM (#4271053)
Sure, but the HTTP cache is managed by the browser. Unless you are pulling down mammoth amounts of data, cache management is unlikely to be a concern for you.
Re:Caching AJAX calls with local storage by d0ugal on Friday July 20, 2012 @11:44AM (#4271271)
Browsers cache many things each time you go to a website - all the html and assets (js/css/images) will be potentially cached (depending on headers). Often you will not go to that website again. They are optimised for this.
Re:Caching AJAX calls with local storage by d0ugal on Friday July 20, 2012 @09:15AM (#4270562)
This is better.