Pushing the whole company into the past on purpose

Re:Pushing the whole company into the past on purpose by peeters on Monday January 13, 2025 @01:03AM (#42680531)

I understand your objection to the policy, I just don't understand where in this thread you latched onto anything objectionable. At most the OP said the slurs don't make sense (really they didn't even say that, they just clarified the subject of what they were saying made sense).

Are you saying the slurs DO make sense? Or is it possible you added some words to what the OP actually said and then objected to that?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Pushing the whole company into the past on purpose by tw04 on Monday January 13, 2025 @08:48AM (#42683378)

I have no idea what thread you’re reading. Nothing about my post was confusing. I asked OP if they really thought calling homosexuality a mental disorder isn’t a slur in response to “the slur doesn’t make sense”.

Then proceeded to get downvoted to oblivion because there’s apparently a large subset of folks who think calling homosexuality a mental disorder is a perfectly normal thing to do.

I notice you also sidestepped the question and continue to act confused though. I’ve spent more time on the topic than I should have, you’re either gaslighting or just unwilling to engage in actual conversation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Pushing the whole company into the past on purpose by dkresge on Monday January 13, 2025 @09:21AM (#42683666)

I believe the intent was thus: “Aye, that makes sense (not the [reauthorization of] slurs, but the explanation). Thanks.”

[ Parent | on HN ]