News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nix – Death by a Thousand Cuts by VTimofeenko on Saturday January 11, 2025 @08:35PM (#42670449)
For those pesky random executables there's a couple of escape hatches -- buildFHSenv and nix-ld. This is also predicated on good provenance of the executables in question. One should probably not even ldd sketchy binaries:

https://jmmv.dev/2023/07/ldd-untrusted-binaries.html

Re:Nix – Death by a Thousand Cuts by micahcc on Saturday January 11, 2025 @09:48PM (#42670863)
steam-run seems to be able to run everything. It uses bubble wrap to keep the OS isolated and add /usr/bin stuff most exes want.
Re:Nix – Death by a Thousand Cuts by SuperSandro2000 on Wednesday January 15, 2025 @11:52AM (#42713436)
*it won't be in the future because it is no longer the grabbag for everything.

Also linking things to /usr/bin is done by the fhs which uses bubblewrap, not steam-run.

Re:Nix – Death by a Thousand Cuts by soraminazuki on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @02:16PM (#42702295)
Even proper packaging is far easier compared to other package managers. Typical distros push users away from packaging their own software, so users end up relying on ad-hoc solutions instead. Nix instead makes packaging easier by having proper tools to abstract away the nitty gritty details.

For random binaries, autoPatchelfHook works miracles.

Re:Nix – Death by a Thousand Cuts by 0x457 on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @05:47PM (#42704991)
Every time I see a linux installation with a mess in /opt because it's faster than making a package, I get annoyed.
Re:Nix – Death by a Thousand Cuts by postcert on Wednesday January 15, 2025 @12:08AM (#42707531)
It wasn’t that bad creating some new derivations my first week with Nixos, I was so used to Arch where I had maybe a handful modified pkgbuilds over a decade.

For better or worse it was a positive experience, especially when you usually already have a pkgbuild to go off of.