Re:Meta's memo to employees rolling back DEI programs
by pests on Friday January 10, 2025 @03:57PM
(#42660109)
There is a flame war preventer that disables replies for a short time depending on frequency and how deep the thread is. Wait a bit or find the post via another UI and it’s usually possible to reply.
Re:Meta's memo to employees rolling back DEI programs
by seryoiupfurds on Friday January 10, 2025 @03:33PM
(#42659841)
OK, so it's "just" systematic racial discrimination then.
Re:Meta's memo to employees rolling back DEI programs
by simoncion on Friday January 10, 2025 @03:56PM
(#42660101)
> (it appears I've been blocked from replying here so:...
You probably haven't been blocked, you've probably run into one of the rumored "conversation slower-downer' mechanisms.
If you select the specific comment that you wish to reply to so that it opens in a page on its own, you should be able to reply to that comment.
Re:Meta's memo to employees rolling back DEI programs
by pests on Friday January 10, 2025 @04:00PM
(#42660154)
Rumored? It’s a very real thing.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16020089
> We tend to call it the 'overheated discussion detector' these days, since it detects more than flamewars.
> Scott and I get emailed every time that software trips so we can quickly look at which threads are being penalized and reverse the penalty when it isn't helpful
- Quotes by Dang
You're fundamentally misunderstanding the word. And it's sad because people (perhaps you) will go around and say that the word 'racist' is overused and has lost it's meaning.
And yet, you (and co) are the ones mistakenly using it here.
EDIT: (it appears I've been blocked from replying here so: to the person below: "Well, better than your first attempt. But the thrust of your comment is still that 'diversity hiring' is the norm. My experience says it's not - and certainly not in the way we apply DEI.")