News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Who killed the rave? Late-night dancing falls into global... by _DeadFred_ on Wednesday January 08, 2025 @02:19PM (#42637495)
'If this were true, we wouldn't need to protect our water bodies with EPA laws. Obviously people prefer polluted bodies of water, and it's the artificial EPA laws that prevent it.'
Re:Who killed the rave? Late-night dancing falls into global... by pfdietz on Wednesday January 08, 2025 @04:30PM (#42638652)
What this analogy says is that people don't want other people living at high density near them. This is expected, since those other people are going to be poor and often dark skinned. Needless to say "other people are pollution, yuck" is not a good argument for zoning.
Re:Who killed the rave? Late-night dancing falls into global... by s1artibartfast on Wednesday January 08, 2025 @05:59PM (#42639452)
I think the argument would be much stronger if it just stopped at poor. While Im sure that type of racist exists, I have never met someone who would object to a rich dark doctor moving in next door. To the extent I encounter racism, it almost always follows the logic that dark = poor = crime & dysfunction
Re:Who killed the rave? Late-night dancing falls into global... by _DeadFred_ on Thursday January 09, 2025 @09:30PM (#42651890)
Nah bro. You didn't call me a racist for this? WTF?