The dude showed of this EU compliant collection.
Multiple pistols and rifles, and what some state would classify as weapons of war, an SBR, or a assault weapon.
All obtained legally via permits and a local cop signing off on the paperwork.
It's actually interesting to met that, in the American discourse, we never discourse an EU-style classification system. Whenever people in the US propose new gun regulation, it always a maximalist approach -- banning the AR-15 completely.
The European system, broadly speaking, is not like that.
There are federal classes for dealers and manufacturers -- manufacturers of silencers, of automatic weapons, of missiles and rockets, &c, and dealers of these articles -- but that also is not like the European classification system I am talking about, which is for end users.
The NFA, which does apply special regulation to silencers, short-barreled rifles and some other items, which allows them to be owned by end users, and that is kind of similar but there is a real difference: you file for a tax stamp and wait for a background check to complete, without having to worry about taking a particular course and getting a certain grade.
Speech, in both the EU and the US is free under the limits set by law, the US isn't an “absolute free speech land”, you will definitely be jailed for speech that goes against the law (for instance death threats, see [1]).
> equity compensation...
What are you talking about, I've been given equity more than once…
[1]: https://nypost.com/2024/12/12/us-news/florida-mom-arrested-f...
AR-15s are actually not banned in many parts of the EU.