News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by Fuzzwah on Tuesday July 17, 2012 @06:19AM (#4255059)
> There is no indications that Mann was actively taking pictures of strangers.

Except for all the photos in the blog post.

Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by jonmrodriguez on Tuesday July 17, 2012 @06:44AM (#4255119)
If you actually read the post, you would see that the device would normally purge its buffer after it finished augmenting / vision processing those frames. Only because it was forcefully shut off was the data retained.
Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by theorique on Tuesday July 17, 2012 @08:07AM (#4255305)
An angry rent-a-cop in the face of the person wielding the camera would not know this.
Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by Fuzzwah on Thursday July 19, 2012 @07:58AM (#4265546)
If you're willing to believe that via a malfunction he was able to get photos off, you've missed my point.

Its possible because they're there. Anything beyond that is arguing against the reality of the photos on the web page.