News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by ilamont on Monday July 16, 2012 @10:12PM (#4253757)
The incident at Logan airport was big news in Boston in 2007. It involved an MIT undergraduate wearing a piece of art on the front of her shirt that consisted of a circuit board and LED attached to a battery. It freaked out some airport staff, and the Massachusetts State Police came very close to shooting her:

http://tech.mit.edu/V127/N40/simpson.html

Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by rdl on Monday July 16, 2012 @10:35PM (#4253808)
Different incident from the Steve Mann airport incident. I actually think the Star Simpson incident was caused by her bring really clueless about how paranoid airport security are, getting a dumb guy scared, and then being as rude to security as many civil libertarians can be. (Star is also a friend of mine, and I think she is a lot less likely to almost get killed by security now too :)

I don't understand the benefit to ever being anything but polite to suthority, even while resisting (legally or beyond legally, depending on how important the issue is to you). I "opt out" of rapescans all the time, and am polite, and the whole interaction goes fairly well. (I think it is security theater, but invasive pat downs aren't always inappropriate; just when there is not enough benefit. I'd draw that line as search incident to arrest based on RS and PC developed normally -- just being a passenger on a flight doesn't make you all that much more likely to be a terrorist). Protest in court, in congress, on the Internet, and during the incident, but don't be threatening or rude.

Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by pavedwalden on Tuesday July 17, 2012 @01:43AM (#4254281)
Whenever the Star Simpson incident comes up, I'm surprised how quick people are to blame her. From the accounts I've read, I don't thing she did anything wrong, or even suspicious. (Contrary to reports, the "suspicious substance" in her had was a hardened clay sculpture, not something that could be reasonably mistaken for a block of explosive.)

Since you say she's a friend of yours and might know more details, I'm curious what you think she did wrong.

Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by jlgreco on Tuesday July 17, 2012 @03:25AM (#4254610)
When airport security told her to jump, she neglected to ask, "How high?"
Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by scotty79 on Tuesday July 17, 2012 @01:05AM (#4254174)
That's funny how wires + blinking led => detonator, something you knead in your hand => C4, cute youg girl with bleached hair => suicide bomber

Osama achieved million times more than what he would have dreamed of.

Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by js2 on Monday July 16, 2012 @10:25PM (#4253787)