Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass
by Schwolop on Monday July 16, 2012 @09:31PM
(#4253668)
The technology used in eyetrap and Google's glasses is sufficiently different that I doubt the eyetrap patent is really being infringed by Google. I doubt Steve has the money or desire to take Google to court anyway, and probably holds the patent as a defensive measure against himself being sued by someone like Google.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass
by ChuckMcM on Tuesday July 17, 2012 @01:51AM
(#4254301)
Sort of FYI, plaintiff lawyers in the US may choose to work on a contingency basis if they think there is a big payoff at the end, no cost to the plaintiff, just let them sue on your behalf and they are off to the races.