Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass

Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by waterlesscloud on Monday July 16, 2012 @08:32PM (#4253479)

Plus if you're not automatically controlling portions, a bottle of liquor can have a very wide range of plausible drinks-sold-per-bottle. Probably by a factor of two or so.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by jlgreco on Monday July 16, 2012 @08:43PM (#4253522)

Exactly. You can easily get a few hundred dollars from a single bottle if you do it right. Just think of all those 10-15 USD mixed drinks that have maybe a shot or two of booze in them.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by philwelch on Tuesday July 17, 2012 @12:15AM (#4254056)

But then you'd have to account for the mixers.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by jlgreco on Tuesday July 17, 2012 @02:53AM (#4254497)

Yes, depending on the drink. You could probably safely forge the accounting for that stuff though, and if not, that stuff is ultra cheap anyway. Soda-water, ice, fruit, etc could all be pretty much ignored.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by einhverfr on Monday July 16, 2012 @09:49PM (#4253701)

My brother was in a bar once where he ordered a shot of whisky and it came in at about 4-5 oz or so. Maybe it was money laundering?

[ Parent | on HN ]