News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by jlgreco on Monday July 16, 2012 @07:56PM (#4253362)
You throw out the merchandise with the highest profit margins while reporting fake sales.

Bars are traditionally popular for money laundering because everyone pays in cash, liquor has absolutely insane mark-up, and it's really easy to pour it down the drain. I imagine a fastfood restaurant would not work as well, but who knows.

Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by waterlesscloud on Monday July 16, 2012 @08:32PM (#4253479)
Plus if you're not automatically controlling portions, a bottle of liquor can have a very wide range of plausible drinks-sold-per-bottle. Probably by a factor of two or so.
Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by jlgreco on Monday July 16, 2012 @08:43PM (#4253522)
Exactly. You can easily get a few hundred dollars from a single bottle if you do it right. Just think of all those 10-15 USD mixed drinks that have maybe a shot or two of booze in them.
Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by philwelch on Tuesday July 17, 2012 @12:15AM (#4254056)
But then you'd have to account for the mixers.
Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by jlgreco on Tuesday July 17, 2012 @02:53AM (#4254497)
Yes, depending on the drink. You could probably safely forge the accounting for that stuff though, and if not, that stuff is ultra cheap anyway. Soda-water, ice, fruit, etc could all be pretty much ignored.
Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by einhverfr on Monday July 16, 2012 @09:49PM (#4253701)
My brother was in a bar once where he ordered a shot of whisky and it came in at about 4-5 oz or so. Maybe it was money laundering?
Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by rmc on Tuesday July 17, 2012 @05:53AM (#4254978)
it's really easy to pour it down the drain

Or sell it on the black market.