News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ada's Dependent Types, and Its Types as a Whole by pjmlp on Saturday December 28, 2024 @07:02AM (#42530429)
Re:Ada's Dependent Types, and Its Types as a Whole by mirashii on Saturday December 28, 2024 @07:19AM (#42530522)
> out in the open

This part was an important part of the sentence you might've missed.

Re:Ada's Dependent Types, and Its Types as a Whole by pjmlp on Saturday December 28, 2024 @09:47AM (#42531378)
Re:Ada's Dependent Types, and Its Types as a Whole by quietbritishjim on Saturday December 28, 2024 @03:29PM (#42534355)
The original point is that there is only one open implementation. This is a link to that one open implementation. You are pushing this conversation around in circles.
Re:Ada's Dependent Types, and Its Types as a Whole by pjmlp on Saturday December 28, 2024 @04:59PM (#42535167)
How many open implementations are there for plenty of other languages, like the main implementations, driving the whole ecosystem, not partial implementations with if and buts?
Re:Ada's Dependent Types, and Its Types as a Whole by CRConrad on Monday December 30, 2024 @05:28AM (#42548110)
How many open implementations are there of Rust?

(Serious question; I genuinely don't know. Always assumed it was about 1, though.)

Re:Ada's Dependent Types, and Its Types as a Whole by pjmlp on Monday December 30, 2024 @06:21AM (#42548360)
Only 1, additionally there are two competing ones based on GCC still WIP, and an alternative backend (Cranelift) without the capabilities LLVM can offer in performance.
Re:Ada's Dependent Types, and Its Types as a Whole by Agingcoder on Saturday December 28, 2024 @11:03AM (#42531937)
Do they all support the latest standards ?
Re:Ada's Dependent Types, and Its Types as a Whole by pjmlp on Saturday December 28, 2024 @11:21AM (#42532066)
A couple of them do, it isn't as if C and C++ FOSS compilers do as well.

https://en.cppreference.com/

C++23 and C23 are the latest, and there are plenty of missing features from previous standards.