To say "flying a drone makes it a credible threat" to say "drones are illegal," which someone is free to take up as their legislative priority.
On a side note, do you have a TRUST or Part 107?
> Many of the drone-downing systems do not permanently destroy it.
Uhh yeah if a consumer grade drone falls 300 feet out of the sky then yes it's destroyed.
Look up TFRs. Look up all the other restrictions these drones are supposed to be following. Tell me how they're legal.
"Uhh yeah if a consumer grade drone falls 300 feet out of the sky then yes it's destroyed."
Not irreparably. Some components will.
https://nypost.com/2024/12/28/us-news/mystery-nj-drone-sight...
> Not irreparably. Some components will.
Okay.
Lol what are you even arguing right now? It is not legal for the USG to destroy, seize, or damage people's property when they are not breaking the law or credibly threatening people. At the times of the drone sightings, there was no evidence whatsoever of them breaking the law or credibly threatening people.
Please state your position explicitly instead of this silly dance.
I think it depends. The smaller drones are allowed to be zapped using equiptment designed to take down drowns. They generally aren't shooting traditional munitions at drones domestically for multiple safety reasons, unless they are over a specific size/altitude.