The same type of argument has been made for decades -- when coders wrote in ASM, folks would ask "are you still a coder when you use that fancy C to make all that low-level ASM obsolete?". Etc etc.
Do consider script kiddies hackers?
Something/someone other writes the code, that's outsourcing.
I wouldn't consider myself an artist if I create a picture per midjourney.
Do you design all the NAND gates in your processor to get the exact program you want out of it or use a general purpose processor?
Current "coding" is just a detail of what you want to do: solve problems. Which can require making a machine do what you want it to.
A coder writes code in a programming language, that what distinguishes them from the customers who use natural language. The coder is the translator between the customer and the machine. If the machine does that, the machine is the coder.
If you think you are obsolete or faster than anyone else with these tools then you only naive enough to have lost your objectivity to the marketing. I deal with real risk and failures from the output of ChatGPT which have serious financial consequences. The first victim is always the developer, then the tester.
At best, it is very good at ousting people who shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a damn computer.
Citation needed.
AI is a type of outsourcing, you became a customer.