News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why Are Cancer Guidelines Stuck in PDFs?. Parent comment

Re:Why Are Cancer Guidelines Stuck in PDFs? by prepend on Tuesday December 24, 2024 @08:14PM (#42506169)
I love open source EMRs, but has any major country adopted open source EMRs?

I know OpenMRS exists but is mainly used within developing nations.

The US has Vista, made by VA, and it is a beast and no one really wants to use it.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Are Cancer Guidelines Stuck in PDFs? by jampekka on Wednesday December 25, 2024 @06:00AM (#42508180)
If I understand correctly, Estonia made their own EMR/EHR from scratch. The government produced (and commissioned?) software is all open source. https://koodivaramu.eesti.ee/explore

EMR software seems like something that shouldn't be that hard. It's fundamentally a CRUD. Sure, there's a lot of legacy to interface with, but medical software seems like a deeply dysfunctional and probably corrupt industry.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Are Cancer Guidelines Stuck in PDFs? by prepend on Wednesday December 25, 2024 @10:37AM (#42509280)
It’s a famous “should be easy” use case. I think this is wrong only because no one does it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Are Cancer Guidelines Stuck in PDFs? by jampekka on Wednesday December 25, 2024 @12:11PM (#42509795)
I'm sure there's a lot of work, but hundreds of millions per deployment is not justifiable. The Finnish EPIC deployment has cost almost a billion euros.

Estonia's from-scratch system was reportedly about 10 million euros.

[ Parent | on HN ]