News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The journey to save the last known 43-inch Sony CRT. Parent comment

Re:The journey to save the last known 43-inch Sony CRT by beAbU on Monday December 23, 2024 @05:02PM (#42497963)
32 is enough that you need to rotate your head if you want to see all parts of the screen. I have a 32" 4k screen and its a bit annoying, I get cricks in my neck, so I tend to only really use a centre 1080p sized area on the screen, with my winXP era wallpaper showing through around it.

Tbh I'll prefer 27" 4k.

43 might be a bit better because you can move the screen a little farther away.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The journey to save the last known 43-inch Sony CRT by aidenn0 on Monday December 23, 2024 @05:13PM (#42498025)
Surely it depends on the sitting distance? I have 2 27" 19:10 screens next to each other and do not need to move my head to see all parts of the screen.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The journey to save the last known 43-inch Sony CRT by theshackleford on Monday December 23, 2024 @05:41PM (#42498187)
It’s a factor of size and distance. I have an 80cm deep desk with a 32” and it’s fine.

In fact it’s nicer in that I can sit a little further back than a 27” which ultimately is better for my eyes.

[ Parent | on HN ]