I know it can't - the one thing it's missing is the ability to generate coherent and correct (and not ugly) domain-specific illustrations and diagrams to accompany the text. But that's not a big deal, it just means I need to add some txt2img and img2img models, and perhaps some old-school computer vision and image processing algos. They're all there at my fingertips too, the hardest thing about this is finding the right ComfyUI blocks to use and wiring them correctly.
Nothing in the universe says an LLM has to do the whole job zero-shot, end-to-end, in a single interaction.
> I wouldn’t but a lawyer actually went to court with arguments literally written by a machine without verification.
And surely a doctor somewhere tried to heal someone with whatever was on the first WebMD page returned by Google. There are always going to be lazy lawyers doctors doing stupid things; laziness is natural for humans. It's not a valid argument against tools that aren't 100% reliable and idiot-proof; it's an argument for professional licensure.
All the examples you give require domain knowledge which is the opposite of what OP wants, so I’m not sure what your issue is with what I’m saying.
I’m responding to this comment, where I think it’s clear that an LLM can’t event achieve the goal the poster would like.
> You wouldn’t write a legal argument based on what some random stranger told you, would you?
I wouldn’t but a lawyer actually went to court with arguments literally written by a machine without verification.