News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple must ensure interoperability of iPhone with rivals,... by CubsFan1060 on Sunday December 22, 2024 @06:42PM (#42490168)
Tell me this -- whatever the next technology is, why would a business spend the time or money to develop it?

Why would Apple, Google, or any of the EU Phone OS developers bother creating a new feature that they will immediately be forced to allow everyone to use?

Re:Apple must ensure interoperability of iPhone with rivals,... by pentamassiv on Sunday December 22, 2024 @07:02PM (#42490307)
I'm sure e.g Jolla would be happy to develop a new feature that helps them become big enough that politicians feel like they need to regulate them
Re:Apple must ensure interoperability of iPhone with rivals,... by ben_w on Sunday December 22, 2024 @06:52PM (#42490236)
AirDrop and AirPlay are 13 and 14 years old — an eternity in software development.

Even full patents only last for 20, and the "utility model" (AKA minor patent*) last 6-15 years depending on jurisdiction.

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utility_model

Re:Apple must ensure interoperability of iPhone with rivals,... by enragedcacti on Sunday December 22, 2024 @08:32PM (#42490890)
> Why would Apple, Google, or any of the EU Phone OS developers bother creating a new feature that they will immediately be forced to allow everyone to use?

Because new hardware/interoperability features are an opportunity to sell more hardware. Apple still gets to make and sell accessories, their product just has to compete on the merits with other products in the segment. People will keep buying Airpods even if Sony's can hand-off between Apple hardware because Airpods are a great product that can stand on their own.

Re:Apple must ensure interoperability of iPhone with rivals,... by sadeshmukh on Monday December 23, 2024 @01:48AM (#42492355)
Or they could do nothing, wait for others to make features, and leech. It incentives parasitic behavior in the long run.
Re:Apple must ensure interoperability of iPhone with rivals,... by kelnos on Monday December 23, 2024 @05:43AM (#42493430)
So what? This idea that every feature or protocol needs to be owned, with allowed uses dictated by some corporation is gross.
Re:Apple must ensure interoperability of iPhone with rivals,... by sadeshmukh on Monday December 23, 2024 @04:46PM (#42497872)
The idea doesn't matter, only the effect. If the net change is less innovation for temporary benefit, then it is a failure.
Re:Apple must ensure interoperability of iPhone with rivals,... by kelnos on Monday December 23, 2024 @05:41AM (#42493420)
Because there are still market advantages to creating and maintaining protocols that you are required to license to others.

Making everything proprietary and exclusive is not the only way to make money. And even if you can make more money that way, I don't care: corporations exist at the pleasure of the people, and we should feel free to demand whatever we want from them.

Re:Apple must ensure interoperability of iPhone with rivals,... by ThatPlayer on Monday December 23, 2024 @07:12AM (#42493843)
There is value in being able to lead the direction of the tech with new features. Look at how many companies bother contributing to Linux even though all their competitors get access.

Alternatively, look at Google trying to take control of the web/HTML with their Web Environment Integrity API proposal. If the web was a "Google Protocol" rather than a W3C one, they would have been able to add it despite the negative feedback.