Re:A bestiary of exotic hadrons: the 23 exotic hadrons disco...
by addaon on Friday December 20, 2024 @11:07AM
(#42472268)
Are there a lot of missing overbars in this article, or some other typographic marker for antiquarks? I assume the hexaquark descriptions early on are supposed to be (using Q for q-overbar) "QQQqqq or qqqqqq", where it reads to me as "qqqqqq or qqqqqq".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A bestiary of exotic hadrons: the 23 exotic hadrons disco...
by cwillu on Friday December 20, 2024 @11:19AM
(#42472388)
“Other manifestly exotic hadrons followed, with two exotic hadrons Tcccc(6600) and Tcccc(6900) observed by LHCb, CMS and ATLAS in the J/ψJ/ψ spectrum. They can be interpreted as a tetraquark made of two charm and two anti-charm quarks – a fully charmed tetraquark.”
Not sure if it was deliberate or not, but yeah.
Re:A bestiary of exotic hadrons: the 23 exotic hadrons disco...
by dukwon on Friday December 20, 2024 @12:38PM
(#42473073)
They are there in the print version (page 26)
https://cerncourier.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CERNCouri...