Re:Why conversations are better with four people
by hindsightbias on Saturday December 14, 2024 @11:27AM
(#42417994)
It could only go back to 1992 or so. For most people, history is whatever is linkable or the 5% of pre-1992 stuff that is popular enough to rate a dead wiki footnote.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why conversations are better with four people
by wslh on Saturday December 14, 2024 @01:51PM
(#42418725)
The Google Ngram Viewer indicates that data was indexed well before 1992, even if the resource isn’t publicly accessible [1]. This likely reflects the reality that new content often garners more attention than old content, which doesn’t align with the "pay-per-click" model of monetization.
[1] https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=darwin&year_st...