News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:PowerShell vs. Unix shells by rbanffy on Friday July 13, 2012 @03:53PM (#4241558)
> It means that there are zillions of implementations of various parsers. That inefficiency costs money.

Most of them (if you are referring to command-line utilities) are open-source. I see this variety of implementations as a good thing - evolution relies on diversity and the openness makes it possible for software to "reproduce sexually", making evolution easier.

Re:PowerShell vs. Unix shells by Someone on Saturday July 14, 2012 @07:45PM (#4245657)
And yet, after 40+ years, the (AFAIK) best this evolution has produced is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xargs, which, if I follow http://stackoverflow.com/questions/896808/find-exec-cmd-vs-x..., still lacks an all-important -- argument. Or maybe we should follow http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7039130/bash-iterate-over...?

I think the Unix world needs something that stands to the combination of find and xargs as ack (http://betterthangrep.com/) stands to grep.