Re:Judge Refuses to Allow Sale of Infowars to The Onion
by Eisenstein on Wednesday December 11, 2024 @11:13AM
(#42389253)
That's why we have courts and juries, to make these evaluations. Why should your number should be used over theirs?
Re:Judge Refuses to Allow Sale of Infowars to The Onion
by impossiblefork on Wednesday December 11, 2024 @11:32AM
(#42389502)
Because it's obviously crazy. 1 billion dollars is the 588 people's entire life income.
It's just excessive.
Re:Judge Refuses to Allow Sale of Infowars to The Onion
by mikeyouse on Wednesday December 11, 2024 @11:45AM
(#42389701)
Alex jones sold something like $165M in supplements in the 3 years preceding this case… this is somehow the opposite of people complaining that judgements against FB are too small based on the Revenue.
Re:Judge Refuses to Allow Sale of Infowars to The Onion
by pythonaut_16 on Wednesday December 11, 2024 @11:59AM
(#42389878)
So you're saying the legal system should hinge on the judgement of what random people believe is "crazy" rather than judges, juries, laws, etc. One opinion should outweigh everyone and everything else?
Re:Judge Refuses to Allow Sale of Infowars to The Onion
by Eisenstein on Wednesday December 11, 2024 @12:26PM
(#42390250)
The people who saw all the information and heard from the parties involved made that decision. You are saying they are wrong based on a feeling.
Re:Judge Refuses to Allow Sale of Infowars to The Onion
by hajile on Wednesday December 11, 2024 @01:38PM
(#42391155)
It was a default judgement. No trial took place and there was no ability for the jury to see evidence from both sides. The monetary amount was absolutely based on feelings.
Re:Judge Refuses to Allow Sale of Infowars to The Onion
by Eisenstein on Wednesday December 11, 2024 @02:00PM
(#42391415)
They heard testimony, including Jones'. The fact that they weren't able to see evidence from the other side is because they refused to give any.
Re:Judge Refuses to Allow Sale of Infowars to The Onion
by giancarlostoro on Wednesday December 11, 2024 @10:50AM
(#42388959)
If that's the case, I sure hope nobody finds my post history from my teen years, or the history of anyone who was a rebellious teen on the internet in the 2000s.
But 500k per person maybe, if it really heinous?