I don't even get the sense the questions/answers have been written by a human? I have no idea how you could land on the three available options for the cultural environment question.

Which questions do you mean? They were definitely written by a human (me). However, as I am a non-native English speaker, they might not be clear enough.

I could have been more constructive her in fairness! It's not so much the language as the presentation of the options in that specific question - they're kind of presented as a scale but the middle options deals with a different variable to the outer ones - western vs non-western and traditional vs modern. It might be worth breaking these kinds of questions into Likert scaled for more tightly defined variables.

Looking through the OP's submissions they're probably a bot and can be safely ignored.

Could you please provide me with some examples of incorrect cases? I tried hard to collect accurate data, but it is not easy to do due to the subjectivity of personal preferences.