Re:Software developer arrested in connection with murder of ...
by curtisblaine on Tuesday December 10, 2024 @02:20AM
(#42374599)
They have body cams don't they? If they just shoot a suspect and the body cam suggests no threat to the officer's life, they're in trouble.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Software developer arrested in connection with murder of ...
by tgsovlerkhgsel on Tuesday December 10, 2024 @02:49AM
(#42374763)
If by trouble you mean "get a pension to compensate them for the metal harm they suffered from the shooting" then you're right. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Daniel_Shaver)
Re:Software developer arrested in connection with murder of ...
by lostlogin on Tuesday December 10, 2024 @02:33AM
(#42374673)
Are they? Paid leave for a few years while it’s investigated, then back to work.
Re:Software developer arrested in connection with murder of ...
by pjc50 on Tuesday December 10, 2024 @03:15AM
(#42374879)
No penalty for just turning it off.
Re:Software developer arrested in connection with murder of ...
by thephyber on Wednesday December 11, 2024 @03:08AM
(#42385822)
“They’re in trouble”
Did you not understand my post, or do you not believe my claim?
The objective facts (as established by a body cam) matter very little, only a good faith belief that “I feared for my life or the life of someone in the public”.
Why? The burden of proof is “Innocent until proven guilty” and like I said, the onus is on the prosecution to prove that the officer’s statement that “they feared for their life” was a lie at the time of the incident. That’s extremely difficult to prove, especially when an officer has been on the job for a while and has been conditioned to use the right words to CYA.