News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fire Risk Assessment of Battery Home Storage Compared to ... by Panzer04 on Monday December 09, 2024 @07:51PM (#42372416)
UL is also not the be all and end all. You can build a UL certified pack with pretty shit cells. The most important aspect of a good battery is just use good quality cells that don't blow up.

LG produced a bad batch a few years ago and caused a bunch of fires, while other batteries in the same circumstance were perfectly fine.

Re:Fire Risk Assessment of Battery Home Storage Compared to ... by 0_____0 on Tuesday December 10, 2024 @04:07AM (#42375131)
Cell quality is one thing, but it is also possible and necessary to ensure that cell failures do not cause a thermal cascade that causes adjacent cells to fail. The whole "pack caught fire because of one cell" thing is optional. Ideally a catastrophic cell failure results in some venting of gas and a bunch of blown fuses at the cell interconnect level.
Re:Fire Risk Assessment of Battery Home Storage Compared to ... by HPsquared on Tuesday December 10, 2024 @05:35AM (#42375563)
The level of increased risk depends on how many cells are in the battery. A large battery will need to be well-protected against cascading thermal runaway, but a battery with 2 or 3 cells there isn't much difference.