News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sora is here by dartos on Monday December 09, 2024 @02:28PM (#42369571)
Do not make assumptions about people you do not know in an attempt to discredit them. You seem to be a big fan of that.

I have been working with NLP and neural networks since 2017.

They aren’t just black boxes, they are _largely_ black boxes.

When training an NN, you don’t have great control over what parts of the model does what or how.

Now instead of trying to discredit me, would you mind answering my question? Especially since, as you say, the theory is so simple.

How would you incorporate smooth kinematic motion in such an environment?

Re:Sora is here by benchmarkist on Monday December 09, 2024 @02:32PM (#42369615)
Why would I give away the idea for free? How much do you want to pay for the implementation?
Re:Sora is here by mech422 on Monday December 09, 2024 @02:55PM (#42369878)
cop out... according to you, the idea is so obvious it wouldn't be worth anything.
Re:Sora is here by benchmarkist on Monday December 09, 2024 @02:59PM (#42369921)
It's not worth anything to me but I'm sure OpenAI would be willing to pay a lot of money for opening up the market of video generators with realistic physical evolution. If they want to hire an ultra genius such as myself to do the work then it would be worth at least $500k to them so that's basically the floor for anyone else who wants the actual details. The actual market would be worth billions so I'm basically giving the idea away at that price.
Re:Sora is here by dartos on Monday December 09, 2024 @02:49PM (#42369790)
lol. Ok dude you have a good one.
Re:Sora is here by benchmarkist on Monday December 09, 2024 @02:54PM (#42369865)
You too but if you do want to learn the basics then here's one good reference: https://www.amazon.com/Hamiltonian-Dynamics-Gaetano-Vilasi/d.... If you already know the basics then this is a good followup: https://www.amazon.com/Integrable-Hamiltonian-Systems-Geomet.... The books are much cheaper than paying someone like me to do the implementation.
Re:Sora is here by dartos on Monday December 09, 2024 @03:06PM (#42370000)
Yeah I mean I would never pay you for anything.

You’ve convinced me that you’re small and know very little about the subject matter.

You don’t need to reply to this. I’m done with this convo.

Re:Sora is here by benchmarkist on Monday December 09, 2024 @03:15PM (#42370088)
Ok, have a good one dude.
Re:Sora is here by chillfox on Monday December 09, 2024 @08:09PM (#42372537)
Seriously... The ability to identify what physics/math theories the AI should apply and being able to make the AI actually apply those are very different things. And you don't seem to understand that distinction.
Re:Sora is here by benchmarkist on Monday December 09, 2024 @09:12PM (#42372981)
Unless you have $500k to pay for the actual implementation of a Hamiltonian video generator then I don't think you're in a position to tell me what I know and don't know.
Re:Sora is here by chillfox on Monday December 09, 2024 @10:27PM (#42373419)
lolz, I doubt very much anyone would want to pay you $500k to perform magic. Basically, I think you are coming across as someone who is trying to sound clever rather than being clever.
Re:Sora is here by benchmarkist on Monday December 09, 2024 @11:04PM (#42373618)
My price is very cheap in terms of what it would enable and allow OpenAI to charge their customers. Hamiltonian video generation with conservation principles which do not have phantom masses appearing and disappearing out of nowhere is a billion dollar industry so my asking price is basically giving away the entire industry for free.
Re:Sora is here by chillfox on Tuesday December 10, 2024 @12:17AM (#42374002)
Sure, but I imagine the reason you haven't started your own company to do it is you need 10s of millions in compute, so the price would be 500k + 10s of millions... Or you can't actually do it and are just talking shit on the internet.
Re:Sora is here by benchmarkist on Tuesday December 10, 2024 @12:48AM (#42374143)
I guess we'll never know.