Re:Good union types in Go would probably need types without ...
by troupo on Monday December 09, 2024 @03:08AM
(#42363981)
You can't have "low cognitive overhead" and Go's "let's pollute every single line of code with error handling". Same for "let's have multiple versions of the same type everywhere because we don't have generics" (thankfully, fixed). And so on.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.