Re:Syrian government falls in end to 50-year rule of Assad f...
by fooker on Sunday December 08, 2024 @05:57AM
(#42356431)
They have destroyed the rest of their industrial capacity and economy in the process, an outcome very much desired by US and friends.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Syrian government falls in end to 50-year rule of Assad f...
by cutemonster on Sunday December 08, 2024 @08:51AM
(#42357143)
Russia isn't that interesting any longer, economy wise.
China is the competitor to the US nowadays. All Russia has is nukes and troll farms, and corruption.
Re:Syrian government falls in end to 50-year rule of Assad f...
by mensetmanusman on Sunday December 08, 2024 @09:29AM
(#42357328)
Russia has all the minerals to support any size of Chinese war machine ramping. Itβs not their economy that matters.
Re:Syrian government falls in end to 50-year rule of Assad f...
by cutemonster on Sunday December 08, 2024 @12:03PM
(#42358259)
That doesn't make sense. The minerals don't disappear just because Putin fails invading Ukraine. The minerals will be waiting in the ground no matter what.
Re:Syrian government falls in end to 50-year rule of Assad f...
by aguaviva on Sunday December 08, 2024 @12:34PM
(#42358507)
It seems that something like "they've trashed their economy" would have been a better choice of words.
But -- "destroyed"? What's that supposed to mean? What purpose is served by the use of such hyperbolic language?