Re:Syrian government falls in end to 50-year rule of Assad f...
by fooker on Sunday December 08, 2024 @05:57AM
(#42356431)
They have destroyed the rest of their industrial capacity and economy in the process, an outcome very much desired by US and friends.
Re:Syrian government falls in end to 50-year rule of Assad f...
by cutemonster on Sunday December 08, 2024 @08:51AM
(#42357143)
Russia isn't that interesting any longer, economy wise.
China is the competitor to the US nowadays. All Russia has is nukes and troll farms, and corruption.
Re:Syrian government falls in end to 50-year rule of Assad f...
by mensetmanusman on Sunday December 08, 2024 @09:29AM
(#42357328)
Russia has all the minerals to support any size of Chinese war machine ramping. Itβs not their economy that matters.
Re:Syrian government falls in end to 50-year rule of Assad f...
by cutemonster on Sunday December 08, 2024 @12:03PM
(#42358259)
That doesn't make sense. The minerals don't disappear just because Putin fails invading Ukraine. The minerals will be waiting in the ground no matter what.
Re:Syrian government falls in end to 50-year rule of Assad f...
by aguaviva on Sunday December 08, 2024 @12:34PM
(#42358507)
It seems that something like "they've trashed their economy" would have been a better choice of words.
But -- "destroyed"? What's that supposed to mean? What purpose is served by the use of such hyperbolic language?
With regards to the broader claim that Russian production is outpacing that of the west. Yes, with artillery shells that's probably true, though we are continuing to ramp production. There aren't really any other areas though where a combination of western production + stock drawdowns couldn't supply Ukraine with greater quantities of material.