News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ChatGPT Pro by dartos on Thursday December 05, 2024 @05:57PM (#42333796)
All of what you described can change wildly from model to model. Even across different versions of the same model.

Maybe a database could be built with “tells” organized by model.

Re:ChatGPT Pro by liontwist on Thursday December 05, 2024 @06:25PM (#42334011)
Exactly. Fixing the old tells just means there are new ones.
Re:ChatGPT Pro by handfuloflight on Thursday December 05, 2024 @09:42PM (#42335689)
> Maybe a database could be built with “tells” organized by model.

Automated by the LLMs themselves.

Re:ChatGPT Pro by dartos on Friday December 06, 2024 @08:52AM (#42339786)
No thanks, I’d like it to be accurate ;)

Regular ol tests would do

Re:ChatGPT Pro by handfuloflight on Friday December 06, 2024 @04:59PM (#42344981)
I should have been more precise. I meant the LLMs would output their tells for you, naturally. But that's obvious.
Re:ChatGPT Pro by dartos on Friday December 06, 2024 @05:34PM (#42345304)
They can’t know their own tells… that’s not how any of this works.

Thinking about it a bit more, the tells that work might depend on the usage of other specific prompts.

Re:ChatGPT Pro by handfuloflight on Saturday December 07, 2024 @02:13PM (#42352054)
Not sure why you default to an uncharitable mode in understanding what I am trying to say.

I didn't say they know their own tells. I said they naturally output them for you. Maybe the obvious is so obvious I don't need to comment on it. Meaning this whole "tells analysis" would necessarily rely on synthetic data sets.