News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:'With brain preservation, nobody has to die' by bhhaskin on Tuesday December 03, 2024 @04:25PM (#42311662)
I think it would both be me until it started to drift, which would be almost instantly.
Re:'With brain preservation, nobody has to die' by wutwutwat on Tuesday December 03, 2024 @04:57PM (#42311999)
Right. You'd have a memory of cloning your mind, and the copy wouldn't have a memory of that. From the first boot of the copy, it would be operating with a different set of data than you. Also the fact you exist along side of it, means it's not you. It's a copy of you.
Re:'With brain preservation, nobody has to die' by fragmede on Tuesday December 03, 2024 @11:12PM (#42314432)
As long as we're dreaming up stuff, why do we assume the consciousness wouldn't be shared? what if you woke up and there was one mind but two bodies?
Re:'With brain preservation, nobody has to die' by danparsonson on Thursday December 05, 2024 @04:38AM (#42326528)
For myself at least, consciousness is the product of the body and in particular the brain. Without any kind of high bandwidth connection between two bodies, I don't see how your proposal could work.

That said, I wonder if that offers a possible way to 'transfer consciousness' between a human and their robot copy - link both brains together and then once synchronised (whatever that means), shutdown the biological half. Like a sort of extended Ship of Theseus idea.

Re:'With brain preservation, nobody has to die' by bhhaskin on Thursday December 05, 2024 @07:33PM (#42334584)
That's an interesting idea. I think as long as the continuity of consciousness happens then it doesn't matter and you would negate the copy problem.