Re:Jeff Dean Responds to EDA Industry about AlphaChip
by gabegobblegoldi on Sunday December 01, 2024 @05:38PM
(#42291254)
Looks like he aligned himself with the wrong folks here. He is a system builder at heart but not an expert in chip design or EDA. And also not really an ML researcher. Some would say he got taken for a ride by a young charismatic grifter and is now in too deep to back out. His focus on this project didn’t help with his case at Google. They moved all the important stuff away from him and gave it to Demis last year and left him with an honorary title. Quite sad really for someone of his accomplishments.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Jeff Dean Responds to EDA Industry about AlphaChip
by t_serpico on Sunday December 01, 2024 @07:29PM
(#42291893)
I don't think he got taken for a ride. Rather, he also wanted to believe that AlphaChip would be as revolutionary as it claimed to be and chose to ignore Chaterjee's reservations. Understandable, given all the AlphaX models coming out around that timeframe.
Re:Jeff Dean Responds to EDA Industry about AlphaChip
by alsodumb on Sunday December 01, 2024 @05:45PM
(#42291309)
I mean Jeff Dean is probably more ML researcher than probably 90% of the ML researchers out there. Sure, he may not be working on state of the art stuff himself; but he's too up the chain to do that.
Re:Jeff Dean Responds to EDA Industry about AlphaChip
by dogleg77 on Sunday December 01, 2024 @07:19PM
(#42291834)
That's an appeal to authority, and not an effective one. Jeff Dean doesn't have a good track record in chip design.
Re:Jeff Dean Responds to EDA Industry about AlphaChip
by wholehog on Monday December 02, 2024 @12:41AM
(#42293431)
What are you even talking about? Jeff had a hand in TPU, which is so successful that all other AI companies are trying to clone this project and spin up their own efforts to make custom AI chips.
Re:Jeff Dean Responds to EDA Industry about AlphaChip
by otterley on Monday December 02, 2024 @10:46AM
(#42297291)
By what measure are TPUs “successful”? Where is your data coming from?
Re:Jeff Dean Responds to EDA Industry about AlphaChip
by cosentiyes on Tuesday December 03, 2024 @12:00PM
(#42308381)
They're the only non-nvidia accelerator used to train state of the art large language models at scale?
Re:Jeff Dean Responds to EDA Industry about AlphaChip
by otterley on Tuesday December 03, 2024 @08:36PM
(#42313686)
AWS Trainium does as well: https://aws.amazon.com/ai/machine-learning/trainium/
Re:Jeff Dean Responds to EDA Industry about AlphaChip
by dogleg77 on Monday December 02, 2024 @02:13PM
(#42299356)
Please specify what you mean by "had a hand in TPU" and where else he had his hand. Thank you
Re:Jeff Dean Responds to EDA Industry about AlphaChip
by the-rc on Sunday December 01, 2024 @10:26PM
(#42292819)
Not a ML researcher, too? He was working on neural networks in 1990. Last year he was under Research and now reports directly to Sundar. What do you know that we don't?
Re:Jeff Dean Responds to EDA Industry about AlphaChip
by wholehog on Monday December 02, 2024 @12:39AM
(#42293421)
> Some would say he got taken for a ride by a young charismatic grifter and is now in too deep to back out.
Was the TPU physical design team also taken in? And also MediaTek? And also TF-Agents, which publicly said they re-produced the AlphaChip method and results exactly?
Re:Jeff Dean Responds to EDA Industry about AlphaChip
by dogleg77 on Monday December 02, 2024 @11:23AM
(#42297680)
What did the TPU physical design team say about this publicly? Can you also point to a statement from MediaTek? (I've seen a quote in Google blog, but was unable to confirm it). Who in the TF-agents team has serious physical design background?
Re:Jeff Dean Responds to EDA Industry about AlphaChip
by wholehog on Monday December 02, 2024 @01:06PM
(#42298651)
Are you really suggesting that the TPU team does not stand behind the graphs in Google's own blog post? And that MediaTek does not stand behind their quoted statement?