News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Conversational Game Theory. Parent comment

Re:Conversational Game Theory by Asraelite on Thursday November 28, 2024 @02:08PM (#42267787)
I don't see any grammatical errors, just some possible missing punctuation. The arguments Gemini gives are just opinions about stylistic choices. Could you point out the specific grammar mistakes you see?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Conversational Game Theory by hoofish on Thursday November 28, 2024 @02:17PM (#42267865)
These are just grumpy posters, while I was not expecting the post to get all of this attention, its usually the ones who are reactive or trolling who respond here. They want to find so many mistakes just so they don't have to admit to themselves that they don't understand what the project is or how it works.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Conversational Game Theory by mistermann on Thursday November 28, 2024 @03:04PM (#42268199)
You've taken this ubiquitous phenomenon into account in the design I hope?
[ Parent | on HN ]