News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Conversational Game Theory. Parent comment

Re:Conversational Game Theory by hoofish on Thursday November 28, 2024 @10:34AM (#42265949)
i think natural skepticism is a good idea. This is an independent project outside of academia, some think that projects outside of academia are crank projects by default, comes with the territory. Project should be judged on its own merits. This is just a stealth site.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Conversational Game Theory by waveBidder on Thursday November 28, 2024 @11:07AM (#42266289)
I agree, but this is obvious crankery.

> Perfect conversations are made possible through Conversational Game Theory.

this is not the sort of thing someone who has thought critically about their own work says.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Conversational Game Theory by hoofish on Thursday November 28, 2024 @02:04PM (#42267759)
You have a very narrow way of conducting a review :)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Conversational Game Theory by hoofish on Thursday November 28, 2024 @02:22PM (#42267909)
Ummm, clearly it is! Why does something have to be cranky just because you don't understand it? Maybe that's on you, dude.
[ Parent | on HN ]