News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The US copyright office has struck down a major effort fo... by cess11 on Wednesday November 27, 2024 @03:36PM (#42259483)
Why do you think that? Can you point to some early philosopher of law that made such utilitarian arguments?
Re:The US copyright office has struck down a major effort fo... by jmward01 on Wednesday November 27, 2024 @03:48PM (#42259609)
The actual text of the US constitution maybe?

Article I Section 8 Enumerated Powers Clause 8 Intellectual Property

        To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

Seems like the idea is to promote innovation by making sure it is for a limited time only seems pretty ingrained in the idea.
Re:The US copyright office has struck down a major effort fo... by tmtvl on Wednesday November 27, 2024 @04:02PM (#42259737)
If it says 'for a limited time', then wouldn't tying itmto the lifetime of the author be unconstitutional? Because strictly speaking it's impossible to predict whether an author's life will end.
Re:The US copyright office has struck down a major effort fo... by samatman on Wednesday November 27, 2024 @04:13PM (#42259835)
It's in fact trivially easy to predict whether an author's life will end.

Watch: I predict an author's life will end. I give it very high odds indeed.

Re:The US copyright office has struck down a major effort fo... by tastyfreeze on Wednesday November 27, 2024 @04:39PM (#42260049)
Corporations can hold copyright and can be undying.
Re:The US copyright office has struck down a major effort fo... by HWR_14 on Wednesday November 27, 2024 @05:01PM (#42260244)
If the author is a real person, it's life of the author plus. If it is a corporation it is a fixed amount of time.
Re:The US copyright office has struck down a major effort fo... by bitwize on Wednesday November 27, 2024 @04:22PM (#42259911)
Decided in Eldred v. Ashcroft. As long as Congress stipulates a non-infinite copyright term, it's constitutional. Given that the chance of a human being eventually ceasing to live has been 100% so far, it's legitimate to assume that life + n years is still a finite period of time.
Re:The US copyright office has struck down a major effort fo... by cess11 on Thursday November 28, 2024 @01:10AM (#42262866)
"Progress of Science and useful Arts" isn't utilitarian in the sense "benefit society as a whole".
Re:The US copyright office has struck down a major effort fo... by mrighele on Wednesday November 27, 2024 @03:43PM (#42259553)
For Americans, the utilitarian argument is made in the Constitution:

_"The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises [...] to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries"_ [1]

[1] https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/

Re:The US copyright office has struck down a major effort fo... by cess11 on Thursday November 28, 2024 @01:12AM (#42262869)
Doesn't say anything about "benefit society as a whole".
Re:The US copyright office has struck down a major effort fo... by throwaway48476 on Wednesday November 27, 2024 @03:42PM (#42259545)
Re:The US copyright office has struck down a major effort fo... by anigbrowl on Wednesday November 27, 2024 @03:43PM (#42259554)
Because that's the stated purpose of patents in the US constitution.