News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tesla excluded from EV buyer credits in California proposal by afavour on Wednesday November 27, 2024 @12:15AM (#42253143)
Tesla have benefitted for years from their association with Musk. Deliberately so, their marketing has never been afraid to associate the two very closely when he’s perceived as a genius inventor, the real life Tony Stark, yadda yadda. It’s just come back to bite them. Specifically drawing a circle around “politics” seems like a very convenient opt-out clause.

> We need to change the law to treat political views as a protected trait

Just as soon as someone can define what “political views” are and aren’t, I guess? To choose an extreme example: if I’m a racist that’s bad but if I believe in the political concept of a whites-only ethnostate is that protected?

It’s very, very difficult to define where “politics” starts and stops.

Re:Tesla excluded from EV buyer credits in California proposal by kbelder on Wednesday November 27, 2024 @01:45AM (#42253571)
> if I’m a racist that’s bad but if I believe in the political concept of a whites-only ethnostate is that protected?

Bad views are protected. That's the point of it. Not difficult.

Re:Tesla excluded from EV buyer credits in California proposal by afavour on Wednesday November 27, 2024 @07:32AM (#42255545)
So racists are a protected class in this world? I’m alright without, thanks.
Re:Tesla excluded from EV buyer credits in California proposal by kbelder on Wednesday November 27, 2024 @01:32PM (#42258440)
Those professing unpopular beliefs and belonging to unpopular religions were the very first 'protected class' listed in the constitution.

Not really a 'class' though, since the protection applies to everybody.

Re:Tesla excluded from EV buyer credits in California proposal by afavour on Wednesday November 27, 2024 @02:26PM (#42258907)
So racism is just an “unpopular belief” now? Got it, got it. Still a no from me though, thanks.