News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dwolla Developers by untog on Tuesday July 10, 2012 @01:10PM (#4224885)
I want to love Dwolla, but while it requires people to add money to a balance I just can't see it fitting into a natural flow of purchasing. I see, I click buy, I go to checkout, I checkout... oh wait, not enough money in my account, OK, I'll top it up with some cash... OK, cash added, now I can go back to my original checkout page...

I don't know what the answer is- clearly they want to avoid making a bank transfer for every purchase (which is understandable) but the user experience just seems kind of lacking to me. Last time I checked they did have an automatic option, but it cost users $3 a month. Eh.

Re:Dwolla Developers by wahsd on Tuesday July 10, 2012 @02:49PM (#4225435)
How is you not checking your balance before a purchase in any way different than making sure you have enough money available through your current payment method?

Sounds like you really should be making a point that Dwolla needs to build confidence and adoption. If Dwolla could become or partner with a net bank that has FDIC deposit insurance, I would think that would seriously blow up their adoption rate. I haven't given it a good look recently, but that would make me feel more comfortable with using it; especially if they also partnered with a behemoth like Amazon or Google for payments. They need to make a marketing push as a way to screw Visa, MasterCard, Banks, etc and it's ability to push down prices through lower processing fees.

Re:Dwolla Developers by untog on Tuesday July 10, 2012 @02:58PM (#4225487)
How is you not checking your balance before a purchase in any way different than making sure you have enough money available through your current payment method?

Well, my credit card doesn't require topping up, it requires paying off every month. And my bank account/debit card gets a direct deposit of my wages- I don't have to top it up.

If a lot of places used Dwolla it would make sense to stick $1,000 in my account. But as it is right now, I would be leaving a lot of money in an account I barely use.

Re:Dwolla Developers by tedivm on Tuesday July 10, 2012 @02:09PM (#4225220)
They have a feature called "Dwolla Instance" that lets users use the money from a transfer before it's complete (the $3 option you mentioned), but more importantly they're actually building out their own clearing house that doesn't have the five day delay. As more banks get on board with that we'll have more instant transfer for free (and they're doing a lot to incentivize the banks).
Re:Dwolla Developers by larrys on Tuesday July 10, 2012 @01:43PM (#4225072)
"I just can't see it fitting into a natural flow of purchasing."

Dwolla is a benefit to merchants. Under $10 no fee over $10 .25 (see how long this lasts of course). Presumably the merchant because they are saving money will offer an incentive to the buyer to make the trouble worth it, at least in theory.

Re:Dwolla Developers by shtylman on Tuesday July 10, 2012 @03:41PM (#4225722)
It is not a benefit if that money isn't actually there. They provide no guarantee that the funds are yours to use since they can be hit with chargebacks and will just take the money from you. This is just as bad as paypal.
Re:Dwolla Developers by JVIDEL on Tuesday July 10, 2012 @04:40PM (#4226048)
Doesn't amazon payments have the same problem?
Re:Dwolla Developers by shtylman on Tuesday July 10, 2012 @04:57PM (#4226152)
I don't know anything about amazon payments, but anything that is dealing with the US banking system via ACH or the credit card system is exposed to chargebacks.
Re:Dwolla Developers by JVIDEL on Tuesday July 10, 2012 @08:34PM (#4227081)
Only US?