Airbnb won because:
- Better design, easy to use, nice pictures they took themselves at first (per PG's advice)
- Integrated payments and reviews in a seamless experience
- Popularized the idea of sharing a space when the host is there
- Offered unique accommodations in urban places
- Lots of buzz about treehouses, castles, teepees, shipping containers, etc.
- Their timing benefited from the Great Recession
- Very good at promoting their rag to riches story with YC's help
- Also you didn't need to constantly repost like Craigslist, just post once
this was not a popular option, and I don't believe was ever intended to be. It also opened the door for VRBO to gain traction explicitly marketing NOT sharing accommodation. The "rent out your spare bedroom" has never been a major component; it was a fake-out to counter the regulatory & licensing complaints they were facing.
It's also quite literally in the name - 'bnb' - which necessarily implies the hosts are there with you.
I'm not debating that professional, non-resident hosts were and are the majority of the platform, just that it wasn't the original intent.
This pattern, of owning demand for food (instacart), transport (uber, etc), delivery (uber eats, etc) is a different model that doesn't own the assets outright and facilitates it instead.
Uber is a net good since it reduces drunk driving. Not sure about Airbnb destroying the rental market...
That said, I was an active member of couchsurfing.org prior to Airbnb eating its lunch, so maybe you could make the argument that we’d be off better as a whole with a free community-oriented platform.