A (temporary) monopoly is not as bad in something that wouldn't otherwise exist. If Elon Musk concentrated only on cars, or SpaceX had had another couple of launch failures and gone bust, this functionality might be 40 years away.
Not to say you're wrong, we all benefit from competition in the long run. We get it from a level playing field and preventing natural monopolists from locking the gate behind them.
Re:Starlink Direct to Cell
by jonplackett on Monday November 25, 2024 @05:25AM
(#42234943)
I agree a (temporary) monopoly is totally OK. Normal in fact.
But the parent comment was specifically celebrating a long term, unassailable monopoly.
If you read it uncharitably. If you read it charitably, the “it’s awesome” can be referring to how quickly they made something work that otherwise wouldn’t for many more years.
Re:Starlink Direct to Cell
by jonplackett on Monday November 25, 2024 @12:22PM
(#42238075)
> Starlink has a constellation two orders of magnitude bigger than any competitor. It’s over. And IMO it’s awesome
I feel like you are being overly charitable. The ‘it’s awesome’ comes directly after the ‘it’s over’
But TBH I’m pretty cyclical at the best of times.
Re:Starlink Direct to Cell
by TrapLord_Rhodo on Monday December 02, 2024 @07:36AM
(#42295583)
politically derelict? he's not a politician, how can he be derelict? From my perspective he's pretty politically deligent... I think what you mean is you disagree with his policies.
I agree the pace of change is amazing. I marvel at everything spacex does. The starship catch was ridiculous.
But no competition always leads somewhere really bad eventually