RGFW: Single-header C99 window abstraction library

Re:RGFW: Single-header C99 window abstraction library by Longhanks on Saturday November 23, 2024 @05:07AM (#42220175)

X11 is utterly broken for multi-monitor setups with different resolutions at different scales (e. g. builtin laptop screen @1.25x, external display at 1x or some variation of that). With high resolution screens (e g. 4k at only 27"), that setup is not uncommon anymore.

(Wayland is broken in very many other ways, though, so you trade one evil for... 5 others).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:RGFW: Single-header C99 window abstraction library by alwayslikethis on Saturday November 23, 2024 @07:36AM (#42220572)

Wayland's scaling for 1.25x and even 1.5x is not so great either, though it is slowly going in the right direction with wp-fractional-scale-v1

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:RGFW: Single-header C99 window abstraction library by uecker on Saturday November 23, 2024 @11:04AM (#42221561)

X was a very well designed system IMHO that could be evolved via extensions (e.g. how compositing was added etc.). It is sad that few people work on it anymore to fix such issues.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:RGFW: Single-header C99 window abstraction library by immibis on Saturday November 23, 2024 @10:38PM (#42225758)

X isn't opinionated enough, and Wayland is even worse. While X has labels like "substructure redirect override" that in practice means "bypass the window manager" and tries to theoretically support multiple window managers, Wayland barely even knows what a window is!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:RGFW: Single-header C99 window abstraction library by immibis on Saturday November 23, 2024 @10:35PM (#42225745)

Correction: Xorg doesn't have good support for this. I don't think there's an extension for it in the protocol either, but one could be created - just as it has for Wayland. Apps that don't support the extension should be scaled by the compositor as usual.

X11 has a reasonably solid core, though, while Wayland does not.

[ Parent | on HN ]