Re:Nordic neighbours release new advice on surviving war
by nostrademons on Monday November 18, 2024 @01:16PM
(#42175198)
Things in his country got worse, but his country ceased to be a legitimate threat outside of its region.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Nordic neighbours release new advice on surviving war
by marcusverus on Monday November 18, 2024 @03:04PM
(#42176318)
Libya is an impoverished backwater with a population of 7m, a GDP per capita of 9K. To whom were they a threat outside of their region?
Re:Nordic neighbours release new advice on surviving war
by fsckboy on Monday November 18, 2024 @03:48PM
(#42176831)
Pan Am 103 springs to mind, a transatlantic flight from Frankfurt to Detroit.
Re:Nordic neighbours release new advice on surviving war
by aspenmayer on Monday November 18, 2024 @07:27PM
(#42178857)
I thought it was now attributed to Iran?
Re:Nordic neighbours release new advice on surviving war
by stereolambda on Monday November 18, 2024 @02:34PM
(#42176034)
One loose analogy could be the death of Stalin. His main men got on fighting for a few years, with a few important ones like Molotov and Beria (initially considered something of a favorite) ending up sidelined or dead. The Cold War ultimately continued, though in a less total manner.
But Stalin's Soviets were comparable to N. Korea, than, say, modern Russia, in terms of regime and its complete grip on everything. So I'd say the result would be more chaotic, might be actually comparable to Libya.