News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Yggdrasil Network by beeflet on Saturday November 16, 2024 @07:30PM (#42160874)
Re:Yggdrasil Network by paulddraper on Sunday November 17, 2024 @03:03AM (#42162714)
Actuate
Re:Yggdrasil Network by ionspin on Sunday November 17, 2024 @07:01AM (#42163725)
I presume you meant to say "Accurate", but it made me think of a off-brand Picard that says "Actuate" instead of "Engage".
Re:Yggdrasil Network by gtirloni on Sunday November 17, 2024 @08:50AM (#42164180)
If the new technology referenced in the comic provides a way to securely connect, including auditing, I don't see how it applies to the hole punching hack.
Re:Yggdrasil Network by beeflet on Sunday November 17, 2024 @09:25AM (#42164331)
People (like ISPs offering routers) set up NAT, often justifying it on the basis of security. Application developers use hole-punching techniques to get past NAT (including stuff like UPnP that requires cooperation from the NAT).

The end product is:

#1 A sandboxing system that cannot reliably sandbox.

#2 A connection system that cannot reliably connect.

So now you have two problems.

Re:Yggdrasil Network by dev_hugepages on Tuesday November 19, 2024 @02:07AM (#42180739)
NAT is not a security measure but a way to save on IP space or avoid remaking a topology on network addresses changes. For actual security you need a firewall