It's interesting but I think the citation is a little misleading. I think the samples of convenience probably oversample for this kind of thing, and some of what they include is stretching the definition of tickertape synesthesia a bit. They say true tickertape synesthesia is probably rare.
The study itself is fair enough imho, I just think that citation is a little misleading without more elaboration, even with the "mild" disclaimer.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17588928.2015.1...
It's interesting but I think the citation is a little misleading. I think the samples of convenience probably oversample for this kind of thing, and some of what they include is stretching the definition of tickertape synesthesia a bit. They say true tickertape synesthesia is probably rare.
The study itself is fair enough imho, I just think that citation is a little misleading without more elaboration, even with the "mild" disclaimer.