News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Watermark Anything. Parent comment

Re:Watermark Anything by Jerrrrrrry on Wednesday November 13, 2024 @04:23PM (#42130141) 

  >proper
doing Scotsman-like lifting when the point was that these things are not considered, or are "externalities"
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Watermark Anything by albumen on Wednesday November 13, 2024 @05:44PM (#42131038)
not sure how that invalidates Algernon's point. These things should be considered, and are in a lot of LCAs.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Watermark Anything by Jerrrrrrry on Wednesday November 13, 2024 @05:47PM (#42131067) 

  >should be considered, and are
Not as much as they should be, was his point. Saying something is not proper is the No True Scotsman fallacy.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Watermark Anything by gmueckl on Thursday November 14, 2024 @02:59AM (#42134013)
Just define "proper" to mean "it is an analysis that considers the whole supply chain and would pass academic peer review".
[ Parent | on HN ]