Re:3600 MHz Raspberry Pi 5 with Liquid Nitrogen
by ruszki on Wednesday November 13, 2024 @11:13AM
(#42127311)
Show me those observations. Without that your word is just another anecdote.
Re:3600 MHz Raspberry Pi 5 with Liquid Nitrogen
by exe34 on Wednesday November 13, 2024 @11:55AM
(#42127718)
what would you accept as evidence? does it need to be certified by a notary public?
Re:3600 MHz Raspberry Pi 5 with Liquid Nitrogen
by ruszki on Wednesday November 13, 2024 @01:20PM
(#42128534)
You know well that a single study about the temperature response of the given CPU is enough.
Re:3600 MHz Raspberry Pi 5 with Liquid Nitrogen
by exe34 on Wednesday November 13, 2024 @02:25PM
(#42129052)
Those CPUs can fly. Now you have to show me a single study about the flight response of the given CPU.
Re:3600 MHz Raspberry Pi 5 with Liquid Nitrogen
by ruszki on Wednesday November 13, 2024 @02:39PM
(#42129159)
The logic which you apply here caused several decades and centuries of scientific delays for no good reason.
Re:3600 MHz Raspberry Pi 5 with Liquid Nitrogen
by exe34 on Wednesday November 13, 2024 @03:31PM
(#42129655)
that's right, we should have been throwing CPUs off a cliff several decades and centuries ago.
Re:3600 MHz Raspberry Pi 5 with Liquid Nitrogen
by emptiestplace on Thursday November 21, 2024 @02:54PM
(#42207946)
Trolling on HN might be one of the stupidest things I've witnessed in a while.
> either way there's no reason to take anecdotes uncritically.
> Because in this thread there are only theoretical explanations why it cannot be
No, the explanations are referring to the mountain of evidence based on the physics of the chips and the known characteristics of the chips of the time. That's not theoretical, that past observations.