News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Large language models in national security applications. Parent comment

Re:Large language models in national security applications by recursive on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @05:01PM (#42120238)
Even if they could afford it, they won't. The UX friction of charging money would send engagement off a cliff, even if the nominal charge was $0.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Large language models in national security applications by hatthew on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @07:34PM (#42121635)
Only half joking, I feel like the majority of comments on the internet are garbage and not worth the time to read, and increasing friction with a nominal charge isn't necessarily a terrible thing.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Large language models in national security applications by recursive on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @08:38PM (#42122041)
It's a good thing for most people, just not the "platforms" trying to show growth.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Large language models in national security applications by exe34 on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @05:05PM (#42120283)
that's why it should be mandated by law for national security reasons!
[ Parent | on HN ]