Re:Large language models in national security applications
by exe34 on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @04:15PM
(#42119778)
charge one penny for every post. most people can afford it. bots become less cost effective and you'd be able to trace the source of funds.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Large language models in national security applications
by recursive on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @05:01PM
(#42120238)
Even if they could afford it, they won't. The UX friction of charging money would send engagement off a cliff, even if the nominal charge was $0.
Re:Large language models in national security applications
by hatthew on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @07:34PM
(#42121635)
Only half joking, I feel like the majority of comments on the internet are garbage and not worth the time to read, and increasing friction with a nominal charge isn't necessarily a terrible thing.
Re:Large language models in national security applications
by recursive on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @08:38PM
(#42122041)
It's a good thing for most people, just not the "platforms" trying to show growth.
Re:Large language models in national security applications
by exe34 on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @05:05PM
(#42120283)
that's why it should be mandated by law for national security reasons!
Re:Large language models in national security applications
by alisonatwork on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @06:50PM
(#42121335)
This is a nice idea, but we already know that organized criminals and state actors have no problem spending money to make money (or influence public opinion).
On top of that, social media isn't like email where a potential transaction fee increases the cost per person reached - a single post on a hot topic could get millions of views.