Re:Bypassing regulatory locks, hacking AirPods and Faraday c...
by nixosbestos on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @03:22PM
(#42119325)
I really wasn't trying to be silly. I feel like other medical things in the US are regulated differently based purely on how they're marketed. How about an Apple Vision Pro with optical zoom on the exterior cameras?
Re:Bypassing regulatory locks, hacking AirPods and Faraday c...
by kube-system on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @04:44PM
(#42120051)
> I feel like other medical things in the US are regulated differently based purely on how they're marketed.
They aren't. Different classes of medical or medical-adjacent products in the US have to be careful how they market so they aren't making claims that they are not allowed to make, but the absence of those claims alone doesn't make a regulated device unregulated.
Re:Bypassing regulatory locks, hacking AirPods and Faraday c...
by luqtas on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @03:25PM
(#42119356)
we could all use some civil disobedience for the good of our kind;
“The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think right.”
Re:Bypassing regulatory locks, hacking AirPods and Faraday c...
by userbinator on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @05:39PM
(#42120562)
In-ear devices with speaker and mic that look like hearing aids that perform hearing aid function for those with hearing loss? Hearing aids.
By that definition every TWS with transparency mode and parametric EQ is a hearing aid.
In-ear devices with speaker and mic that look like hearing aids that perform hearing aid function for those with hearing loss? Hearing aids.
Phones, that look nothing like glasses or contacts, and don't serve the same purpose? Obviously not.
Don't be silly. Judges aren't.