News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Marine pilot loses command after ejecting from F-35B that... by unyttigfjelltol on Monday November 11, 2024 @08:41PM (#42112067)
The article states he was at 1,900 feet in heavy rain with nonfunctional instument panels. He was there, he's got the experience, and he ejected (which is dangerous too).

Maybe the commandant of the Marines would have liked a better headline, but another way of looking at it is the pilot lost his video server and really needed a functioning screen. I just threw away a video card in exactly the same scenario, and I felt I was troubleshooting far too long as it was. Maybe the commandant wanted the pilot to troubleshoot on the ground? But the computer was not any better after it hit the ground.

Re:Marine pilot loses command after ejecting from F-35B that... by db48x on Monday November 11, 2024 @09:01PM (#42112159)
> with nonfunctional instrument panels

This is incorrect. He lost his HUD and the primary flight display, but not the standby instruments. Those are intended as a backup in case the other systems fail, and they did their job and kept operating. You can't use them to fire missiles or keep track of enemy anti–air radar systems, but you can use them to fly the plane, avoid terrain, and land safely. And he didn’t even check to see if they were still working before he ejected.

Re:Marine pilot loses command after ejecting from F-35B that... by ethagknight on Monday November 11, 2024 @10:46PM (#42112610)
>> However, the report said its standby flight display and backup communication system “remained basically functional.”
Re:Marine pilot loses command after ejecting from F-35B that... by bergen on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @02:31AM (#42113517)
The interesting thing here would be to find out what "basically" means in that context.
Re:Marine pilot loses command after ejecting from F-35B that... by ethagknight on Wednesday November 13, 2024 @06:19PM (#42131311)
Probably functional enough that a veteran pilot would know how to operate the plane