News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:It's legal for police to use deception in interrogations.... by simoncion on Friday November 08, 2024 @08:56PM (#42092001)
I'm not sure why this comment was killed. A heading in the ABC 11 article is literally "Officers involved were later promoted". The text of the article later goes on to say

> Months after the interrogation, Guthrie was named a 2019 Employee of the Year for the Fontana Police Department.

> Guthrie is now a sergeant. So is Janusz.

> And Michael Dorsey, the lieutenant who Guthrie says told him and Janusz that officers believed Perez Jr. had killed his father, has been promoted to captain and is now chief of police of Fontana, overseeing 188 sworn officers, according to its website.

Re:It's legal for police to use deception in interrogations.... by 77pt77 on Friday November 08, 2024 @09:35PM (#42092150)
The system working as intended.

This is the hierarchy of competence I keep hearing about.

Re:It's legal for police to use deception in interrogations.... by lazide on Saturday November 09, 2024 @04:02AM (#42093372)
The underlying thing folks miss is - competence in what. Near as I can tell, they were quite competent in what city leadership wanted.
Re:It's legal for police to use deception in interrogations.... by Yeul on Saturday November 09, 2024 @06:24AM (#42093805)
The Chinese have the right to complain about their leaders. We don't because we choose them willingly.

Crime goes down, the poors don't riot and that's all that matters.

Re:It's legal for police to use deception in interrogations.... by ClumsyPilot on Saturday November 09, 2024 @07:59AM (#42094189)
> We don't because we choose them willingly

I mean technically Russia does have elections.

Re:It's legal for police to use deception in interrogations.... by lazide on Saturday November 09, 2024 @09:59AM (#42094735)
Don’t blame me, I voted for Kodos!